科技创新发展战略研究

科技创新发展战略研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 31-39.

• 科技管理与知识管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美竞争背景下两国科技实力的评价与比较

袁明哲1,2, 邵万清2   

  1. 1.华侨大学,福建厦门,362021;
    2.宁波工程学院中国-中东欧国家创新合作研究中心,浙江宁波,315211
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-12 出版日期:2023-04-27 发布日期:2023-04-27
  • 作者简介:袁明哲(1998-),男,硕士在读,研究方向:数字经济与数据分析;邵万清(1978-),男,博士,副教授,研究方向:科技创新合作。
  • 基金资助:
    宁波市软科学重点研究计划项目“新发展格局下宁波参与国际科技竞争与合作对策研究——以中东欧国家为例”(2022R001)

Evaluation and Comparison of the Scientific and Technological Strength Under the Background of Sino-US Competition

YUAN Ming-zhe1,2, SHAO Wan-qing2   

  1. 1. Huaqiao University, Xiamen 362021, China;
    2. Ningbo University of Technology, China-CEEC Innovation Cooperation Research Center, Ningbo 315211, China
  • Received:2022-12-12 Online:2023-04-27 Published:2023-04-27

摘要: 在中美竞争背景下,基于熵权TOPSIS法,从新技术应用能力、技术创新能力和技术资源获取能力3个方面建立两国科技实力评价模型。通过2017—2021年中美两国科技实力指数变化趋势的对比分析,得出结论:第一,中国科技实力增长快速,但与美国仍存在绝对差距;第二,中美两国新技术应用能力同步增加;第三,中国技术创新能力仍低于美国,但增长潜力较大;第四,中美两国在技术资源获取能力上的差距快速缩小。因此,提出中国应加速新技术普及与应用、解决技术瓶颈问题、构建公平开放的技术贸易规则等对策建议。

关键词: 中美竞争, 科技实力, 评价体系

Abstract: Under the background of Sino-US competition, based on the entropy weight Topsis method, this paper establishes an evaluation model of scientific and technological strength from three aspects: new technology application ability, technological innovation ability and technical resource acquisition ability. By comparing the trends of the scientific and technological strength index of China and the United States from 2017 to 2021, the paper finds out that: firstly, China’s scientific and technological strength has grown rapidly, but there is still an absolute gap with the United States; secondly, the ability to apply technology has increased simultaneously; thirdly, China's technological innovation ability is still lower than that of the United States, but its growth potential is relatively large; fourthly, China is rapidly narrowing the gap with the United States in terms of technological resource acquisition capabilities. Thus, the paper proposes countermeasures and suggestions for China to accelerate the popularization and application of new technologies, solve technical bottlenecks, and build fair and open technology trade rules.

Key words: Sino-US competition, technological strength, evaluation system

中图分类号: